An Answer to Emma Watson’s #HeForShe UN Speech

The full speech is here , and if you don’t feel like watching another western feminist backed by globalist NGOs, I will quote the most important points.

HeForShe Campaign Launch
Photo by Eduardo Munoz Alvarez/Getty Images

“This is the first campaign of its kind at the UN. We want to try to mobilize as many men and boys as possible to be advocates for change. And, we don’t just want to talk about it. We want to try and make sure that it’s tangible.”

This, if anything, sounds sexist. As if men can’t be involved in any change and they need YOU and your UN to make them involved. Anyway, no human (whether man or woman) in his/her right mind would get themselves involved in modern feminism.

“I was appointed as Goodwill Ambassador for UN Women six months ago. And, the more I spoke about feminism, the more I realized that fighting for women’s rights has too often become synonymous with man-hating. If there is one thing I know for certain, it is that this has to stop.”

Ah definitely it has to stop because modern feminism is a failure with all those brainwashed women who didn’t achieve anything in their life and resorted thus to blaming men for their own problems. So now this campaign of yours is to “update” feminism so that it involves brainwashed men as well, self-hating men, men who are made to feel guilty and blame themselves for the failure of those women.

“For the record, feminism by definition is the belief that men and women should have equal rights and opportunities. It is the theory of political, economic and social equality of the sexes.”

*yawn* anyone can use google. We all know the literal definition of feminism. It sounds pretty nice in theory but in practice it turned to a bunch of man bashers and now it will involve a bunch of self-hating men as well thanks to Emma Watson and the UN.

“When I was 8, I was confused for being called bossy because I wanted to direct the plays that we would put on for our parents, but the boys were not.”

Ah you probably made up that story but let’s assume it’s true, it doesn’t make you “oppressed”.  If you were oppressed you wouldn’t be speaking at the UN, they only give voice to attention seeking rich celebrities like yourself to distract the people from the true problems the world is facing right now (see this to know about the agenda of celebrities who involve themselves in politics) . Being a woman doesn’t automatically place you among the oppressed people except in the identity politics nonsense, then Hillary Clinton would be oppressed as well and criticizing her would make one “sexist”(hello political correctness).

Now some white supremacist will come and say “she should see how women are oppressed in the Middle East, then she would shut up about oppression”. I’m a Middle Eastern woman and I’m not oppressed and if I were I’d solve my problems by myself. No, we don’t need your NGOs, your drones, or feminism, or liberalism or whatever poisonous ideology the west is willing to export to our countries. And what country in the Middle East oppresses women, Iran? Here is what you don’t hear in the (western) media about the situation of Iranian women.

“I decided that I was a feminist, and this seemed uncomplicated to me. But my recent research has shown me that feminism has become an unpopular word. Women are choosing not to identify as feminists.”

…and that makes them traitors to the cause, right? Or they have, what is it called…”internalized misogyny”.

“Apparently, I’m among the ranks of women whose expressions are seen as too strong, too aggressive, isolating, and anti-men. Unattractive, even.”

Too strong, no. Too aggressive, no. Attention seeking, yes.

“Why has the word become such an uncomfortable one? I am from Britain, and I think it is right I am paid the same as my male counterparts.”

I was about to give a lecture on how the wage gap is a myth because most of the times women simply choose jobs that do not get as much salary as the ones men usually choose but no, probably because Emma Watson knows the truth but truth doesn’t serve the feminist propaganda, so …

“I think it is right that I should be able to make decisions about my own body.”

When feminists says this, they mean abortion, probably. Even though in that issue it’s not just the woman’s body concerned, it’s also the body inside her, but who cares anyway when there’s the ego of a feminist involved.

Funny how many (right-wingers usually) blame socialism/communism over this feminist mumbo jumbo, because all I see in it is an egoistic liberal mentality of private property, selfishness, individualism and “MY body…MY choice…MY life…MY MY MY…ME ME ME…”

“I think it is right that women be involved on my behalf in the policies and decisions that will affect my life.”

And who says women aren’t involved in decision-making concerning their issues and all issues? I mean they do vote nowadays right?

“My life is a sheer privilege because my parents didn’t love me less because I was born a daughter…”

Finally, she admitted that she’s privileged not oppressed…

“…My school did not limit me because I was a girl. My mentors didn’t assume that I would go less far because I might give birth to a child one day. These influences were the gender equality ambassadors that made me who I am today. They may not know it, but they are the inadvertent feminists that are changing the world today. We need more of those.”

Um, nope. They aren’t feminists, they are just decent human beings with common sense, which you lack. Why do you like to label people and classify them as “feminist” and “non-feminist”. Feminism is an IDEOLOGY, following it doesn’t make one a decent person, and NOT following it doesn’t make one a bad person… And being a decent person doesn’t make one a feminist, and being a bad person doesn’t make one a non-feminist. Those feminists consider their ideology as religious extremism, if one doesn’t follow it (especially if she’s a woman) they scream “TRAITOR!”,”INFIDEL!”, etc… and they exactly act as a religious cult with ex-communication and so on.

“And if you still hate the word, it is not the word that is important. It’s the idea and the ambition behind it, because not all women have received the same rights I have. In fact, statistically, very few have.”

No, we don’t hate the word, because it sounds good in theory, but we do hate the idea and ambition behind it, which is seeking attention, spreading propaganda, intervening in foreign countries, destroying societies, destroying morals, encouraging promiscuity, promoting moral degeneracy, encouraging murder (abortion), hating men and also women who do not agree with you. Go back to Harry Potter.


“In 1997, Hillary Clinton made a famous speech in Beijing about women’s rights. Sadly, many of the things that she wanted to change are still true today.”

Hillary Clinton cares very much about women she even bombs them with drones…

“But what stood out for me the most was that less than thirty percent of the audience were male. How can we effect change in the world when only half of it is invited or feel welcome to participate in the conversation?”

Well, let me tell you dear Emma Watson that maybe, just maybe, these women who attended felt OBLIGED to attend so that feminists like yourself won’t bash them and call them traitors. Men do not feel it as their “duty” to attend which if they do not do, they get “ex communicated”. But now you want to make it the duty of men as well… you want to expand the tyranny of the feminist cult to involve men as well.

“Men, I would like to take this opportunity to extend your formal invitation.”

There you go.

“Because to date, I’ve seen my father’s role as a parent being valued less by society, despite my need of his presence as a child, as much as my mother’s. I’ve seen young men suffering from mental illness, unable to ask for help for fear it would make them less of a man. In fact, in the UK, suicide is the biggest killer of men between 20 to 49, eclipsing road accidents, cancer and coronary heart disease. I’ve seen men made fragile and insecure by a distorted sense of what constitutes male success. Men don’t have the benefits of equality, either.”

Ok you do acknowledge that men are also oppressed but why do you call the campaign #HeForShe if so, if you claim that it is supposed to help both men and women? Why not #HeForSheAndSheForHe or just #EveryoneForEveryone? You try to lure men by addressing their problems but the name of the campaign says it all, you want men to hand women everything on a silver plate, I wouldn’t call this empowering for women at all. I’d call it sexist against both men and women and reassigning of gender roles instead of destroying them.

On the campaign’s official FB page the description is “UN Women’s Solidarity Movement for Gender Equality bringing together one half of humanity in support of the other half of humanity, for the benefit of all.”


It does NOT say the two halves should support each other. Instead, ONE (men) should support the other (women).

“We don’t often talk about men being imprisoned by gender stereotypes, but I can see that they are, and that when they are free, things will change for women as a natural consequence.”

So according to you, men will only be free if they submit to servitude for women and join your campaign of “white knights“. So from what I understand, your ultimate goal is to free women, and freeing men from gender stereotypes is a mean not an end?

“If men don’t have to be aggressive in order to be accepted, women won’t feel compelled to be submissive. If men don’t have to control, women won’t have to be controlled.”

Thus men should become controlled by self-absorbed women like yourself…

“I want men to take up this mantle so that their daughters, sisters, and mothers can be free from prejudice, but also so that their sons have permission to be vulnerable and human too, reclaim those parts of themselves they abandoned, and in doing so, be a more true and complete version of themselves.”

If it’s also for their sons, then, again, why did you call it HE for SHE?

“You might be thinking, “Who is this Harry Potter girl, and what is she doing speaking at the UN?” And, it’s a really good question. I’ve been asking myself the same thing.”

I’ll give you the answer – you’re spreading propaganda and promoting the UN.

“Because the reality is that if we do nothing, it will take seventy-five years, or for me to be nearly 100, before women can expect to be paid the same as men for the same work.”

*repeats herself* wage gap is a myth

“15.5 million girls will be married in the next 16 years as children. And at current rates, it won’t be until 2086 before all rural African girls can have a secondary education.”

Don’t pretend now that you care about African girls. The government of your country and all those of big western countries and the UN as well are the ones who oppressed Africans, men and women. You remind me of an Arabic poem verse which says “cure me with the disease itself”…

“If you believe in equality, you might be one of those inadvertent feminists that I spoke of earlier, and for this, I applaud you.”

If you believe men should treat women like helpless children and damsels in distress, you might be some brainwashed simpleton, and for this, I applaud you…

“We are struggling for a uniting word, but the good news is, we have a uniting movement. It is called HeForShe. I invite you to step forward, to be seen and to ask yourself, “If not me, who? If not now, when?””

When people stop buying into this useless feminist crap, hopefully.


We can safely call Emma Watson the white Beyoncé. The latter pretends to empower women of color while investing in sweatshops, and Emma Watson is supposed to be an idol for white women.



Whether male or female, black or white, we can empower ourselves by ourselves, we don’t need a superwoman or a superman or an idol wearing a cape to descend on us from the sky and empower us, especially if they are a part of the Hollywood elite. Now if a leader comes from within the people and their aspirations I would gladly follow him/her, but not someone shoved down our throats by the UN, the ruling establishment and their media outlets.


Don’t follow leaders/activists whom the media and NGOs love, look for those who are defamed and hated, who knows, you might find the inspiration and empowerment you’re looking for in them.


7 thoughts on “An Answer to Emma Watson’s #HeForShe UN Speech

  1. So if emma watson comes to lebanon to fight for women’s rights you would spit on her face because she labels herself “feminist” or because she is a hollywood star ? Was she born a star ?
    There js a feminist movement because there are some inequality issues, do they defend right or wrong values ? Well i dont know everyone is free to have his opinion and if they want to help the women, then i guess these women are also free to make their own choices without a nobody like you to call them brainwashed.
    In lebanon there is a feminist movement simply because the law doesnt protect women’s rights when it comes to divorce or being beaten by a bad husband or things like this. If this feminist movement organizes itself and get sponsored by the un would you also spit on it and call for the women to empower herself by her own like you dont know the lebanese situation ?
    U cant just criticize everything, paint everything in black about everything, and judge people like you’re some che guevara. Humility please


    1. I don’t go at anyone who label themselves as “feminist”, but she was labelling other people as feminists. I believe in equality yet I don’t label myself as feminist and won’t accept anyone labelling me as such, or in any other label than that. The woman who demanded that lebanese women vote (and thanks to her we can vote) never identified as a feminist.

      It’s simple – the UN , since it’s beginning, did more harm than good to the middle east . Why should we lie to ourselves and say that anyone from the UN (whether they’re also in Hollywood or not) would want to benefit anyone here (whether women or men or children) without some hidden suspicious agenda ?

      And i do know well the lebanese situation, I live in Lebanon. Lebanese women do have problems such as a lebanese woman can’t give the nationality to her kids if she marries a foreigner, but are feminists here doing anything about it? They’re busy whining about the word “men” in the national anthem. No society is perfect, Lebanon has its flaws like anywhere else but we don’t want NGOs and UN to come to us and hide their true intentions under the text of women’s rights.

      And it’s me who’s dividing everything into Black or white ? It’s modern feminism to whom you’re either a feminist or a bad person . Not much different than ISIS.


      1. Feminism has a definition and you know it, then anybody who follows the criterias of a “feminist” accordingly to the definition, can be called a feminist.
        The woman you are talking about doesnt represent a movement or a tendance, she may be a particular case, anyway i don’t know her and you haven’t precised her name. That being said, if her main battle was to fight for women’s rights, nowadays she would be called a feminist, because this is the aim of a feminist.
        In your mind anyone who call himself feminist is thrown in the bag of “modern feminism” and is bad, stupid or corrupted by definition, Here you are wrong, leave to the people the choice to say what they want, or what to believe in, what they want, to fight for and what they think is their righteous cause. You want to criticize, well debate the ideas, and this could take you hours, not only a few lines in reaction to some parts of a certain speech, taking the debate to iran, then to the usa, or wherever.
        You prefer to stop at “she is with UN wow she is surely bad”, like all the people working for the UN are corrupted, even the social workers helping the syrian refugees in lebanon, or the unicef helping the poors in africa etc etc, .. or “she is a hollywood star, what does she know about oppression she is certainly a zionist or trying to gain some followers on twitter” just like the girl is born a hollywood star. Then what about you ? Have you been oppressed ? Are you in position to speak about oppression ? Yes you are, because you have a brain and you have feelings, nobody is going to label you and in consequence discredit you, but this is what you are doing in your article, you are labelling her and consequently turning her speech in mockery.
        Now you see you dont want to debate ideas, you come with your own ideas and prejudges, and write an article full of hatred, but you dont offer solutions or give her any credit like she is all black, this is pathetic,
        Although i think we could share some values, the way you express yourself proves your opinion is subjective, based on prejudges, and just like that you lose all credibility and discredit your cause.
        I wish you take my advises into consideration, and write more balanced speeches, where you could debate ideas, Feminism is not all wrong, the word exists you have to live with that, and inside the definition there are many movements and opinions, some of them in favor of LGBT’s other against, some in favor of abortion, other against abortion, etc, you should debate these issues.
        You criticize but your critics are not constructive, so useless.
        good continuation


  2. I was talking about Laure Moghaizel. “Women rights advocate” she is. Feminists (well, third wave ones) want to overthrow the whole system that they deem “patriarchal”, while women rights advocate don’t want to change the whole system they just want, well, women’s rights, within the system itself… no aim to destroy the whole society and fragment it and remove whatever they call “patriarchy” so no, you can’t consider her a feminist in the modern sense.

    I do know some people who call themselves feminists and they’re good people, and they don’t want to destroy the human society and all that and I believe they have good intentions. And no I’m not oppressed but at least I don’t pretend that I am unlike others, unlike those keyboard feminist warriors who have never been oppressed and sit behind computer screens hating all men (and all white people and all straight people and so on).

    I’m sure there are good people in the UN just like anywhere but the organization itself has an agenda, even with some things which do not seem suspicious such as the refugee issue, they have an agenda to make them permanent citizens here.


  3. But you have to precise what you mean by destroying “human society” i have heard about communist society, liberal society, religious society, military society etc etc in the end they all define themselves human society as well, but societies evolve and systems change, how is feminism contributing to destroy what you call human society? And what is a human society ?


    1. I mean the society you and I live in. The relations between people, the family, religion, the environment that surrounds us. Modern feminism sees all this as oppressive and patriarchal and should be eliminated. And the thing is that they don’t even offer an alternative to all that, after they turn the whole system upside down, what will the replacement be? Chaos and anarchy ? Modern feminists create war between men and women (like we also see between black people and white people with movements like Black Lives Matter and also straight people and gay people) and it’s about fragmenting and dividing people instead uniting them.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s